Just How Dumb Americans Have Become (2 unbelievable videos)

Hitler and guns
Print Friendly

Ed. Note: Because this is a lengthy post and because many people tend to not read such posts, if you are pressed for time or don’t want to be educated, just skip to the end and watch the two videos. If nothing else, watch the two videos!

Just how dumb can a person be?

On guns…

Make no mistake Obama and his cohorts wanted to CONFISCATE your guns; registration was merely a first baby step.

In April 2013 we came perilously close to a likely civil or second Revolutionary War.

That’s when Congress turned on us.

The traitorous, treasonous, treacherous liberals in the U.S. Senate came within just FOUR VOTES from voting to hand over our Constitutional gun rights (Second Amendment) to the third world Muslim-run U.N.

And apparently many really dumb Americans were okay with this.

As you’ll see in the two videos below, Americans are largely uninformed, patently obtuse, and unbelievably gullible. These videos are made in California where we expect this kind of sub-mentality. Apparently uneducated liberals will believe just about anything.

That’s because today our public schools and most colleges and universities have become propaganda mills, spewing leftist bile and so many lies so often that it is impossible for young minds to comprehend the level of hokum spewed by these liberals. And so our young people, more commonly called “snowflakes” and “millennials,” grow up exceedingly and hopelessly dumb. You’ll see when you watch these unbelievable videos.

In a 53-46 vote, the U.S. Senate narrowly passed a measure to PREVENT the U.S. from entering into the unconstitutional U.N. Arms Trade Treaty that Obama and the liberals coveted.

Patriots in the Senate, thankfully still a majority, voted to uphold Second Amendment rights and prevent the United States from entering into the despicable U.N. treaty.

The U.N. Small Arms Treaty, championed by Obama and Nazi-like liberals, would have placed a global ban on the import and export of small firearms.

The ban would have affected all private gun owners in the U.S. (that’s YOU!) and had language that would have implemented an international gun registry on all private guns and ammo!

Astonishingly, 46 U.S. Senators were more than willing to give away our Constitutional rights to a club of thieves, cutthroats, despots and killer Muslims: the third world U.N.

Following are the names of the 46 traitors who voted to give away your RIGHTS to the U.N. Note that EVERY ONE OF THEM EVERY DAMNED ONE! is a liberal. These days, a “D” attached to a politician’s name does not signify “Democrat”; it means ‘DUMB’ liberal. And note that loony Bernie Sanders of Vermont, who is probably the worst of the lot in Congress whose policies are patently insane, is a socialist loon who ran for president!

The traitors are: Baldwin (D-WI), Baucus (D-MT), Bennet (D-CO), Blumenthal (D-CT), Boxer (D-CA), Brown (D-OH), Cantwell (D-WA), Cardin (D-MD), Carper (D-DE), Casey (D-PA), Coons (D-DE), Cowan (D-MA), Durbin (D-IL), Feinstein (D-CA), Franken (D-MN), Gillibrand (D-NY), Harkin (D-IA), Hirono (D-HI), Johnson (D-SD), Kaine (D-VA), King (I-ME), Klobuchar (D-MN), Landrieu (D-LA), Leahy (D-VT), Levin (D-MI), McCaskill (D-MO), Menendez (D-NJ), Merkley (D-OR), Mikulski (D-MD), Murphy (D-CT), Murray (D-WA), Nelson (D-FL), Reed (D-RI), Reid (D-NV), Rockefeller (D-WV), Sanders (I-VT), Schatz (D-HI), Schumer (D-NY,), Shaheen (D-NH), Stabenow (D-MI), Udall (D-CO), Udall (D-NM), Warner (D-VA), Warren (D-MA), Whitehouse (D-RI), Wyden (D-OR)

On a happier note, New York’s leftist Gov. Andrew Cuomo, AS I PREDICTED, in his zeal to become the first in the U.S. to confiscate guns, overstepped his authority and stepped into dog poo. It was inevitable.

Cuomo signed an unconstitutional bill (the SAFE. Act), and hopefully he will pay the price. Cuomo may be liable PERSONALLY for damages in what will almost certainly eventually become a federal civil rights lawsuit if Cuomo’s Storm Troopers arrest someone using the unconstitutional law he championed. And in such a case Cuomo will NOT enjoy indemnity. I hope he’s financially destroyed.

Well, it happened, and under Cuomo’s direction the New York State Police confiscated guns — from the wrong guy!

Hmm… I guess Cuomo never heard about Obama’s and Biden’s promise: “We’ll never come take your guns.”

A New York gun owner received a notice ordering him to surrender any and all weapons to his local police department. The notice read that his permit to own a gun in New York was also being suspended. He contacted attorney Jim Tresmond, a specialist in gun laws in New York, and they visited the local police precinct.

Attorney Tresmond reportedly entered the precinct and informed officers that his client, who was waiting in the parking lot, would voluntarily surrender his weapons as requested. The local police were aware of the letter because they had already been contacted by Cuomo’s private Gestapo: the State Police.

According to Cuomo’s unconstitutional law, if people do not respond to the mailing, local law enforcement will visit the gun owner and demand the surrender of the firearms. The guns and permits were handed over and a receipt given to the client.

After the guns were seized (involuntary surrender is seizure!), the attorney filed a request for a hearing and the gun owner is expecting to have his Second Amendment rights restored.

But there is more to this story.

The client, who has never had a problem with the law, had an alleged temporary, short term health issue that required medication. And somehow Cuomo’s Gestapo learned of it. Hmm… how did they?

This incursion into PRIVATE health records is a violation of HIPAA and Health Information Privacy policies. If it is ruled to be a violation, it will become a civil rights issue.

This happened because idiot liberals pushed through a reckless gun control law literally in the middle of the night (if that sounds familiar, it should; think “Obamacare”) thanks to libtard Andrew Cuomo.

How did the confiscation occur so quickly? Apparently the gun-grabbing was triggered by something inside the SAFE Act that provides for mandated confiscation of weapons and permits if someone has been prescribed psychotropic drugs.

BUT OOPS, THEY HAD THE WRONG GUY!

Erie County Clerk Chris Jacobs said that he received a call from the New York State Gestapo Police informing him that they provided information on the wrong person when they notified his office of someone whose permit should be suspended because of the new mental health provisions in New York’s unconstitutional SAFE Act.

“When the State Police called to tell us they made a mistake and had the wrong person… it became clear that the state did not do their [sic] job here and now we all look foolish,” the release went on to say in a quote from Jacobs.

This is what happens when idiotic, politically motivated, gun-grabbing liberal zealots who have no idea what they’re doing speedily pass unconstitutional legislation.

And this time they violated someone’s civil rights. And broken the law, to boot.

The quotations:

  • New York’s Nazi Gov. Andrew Cuomo: “This is not taking away people’s guns.”
  • Barack HUSSEIN Obama: “I will not take your shotgun away, I will not take your rifle away, I won’t take your handgun away.” Except for endorsing and signing the U.N. treaty mentioned above.
  • The blabbering Joe Biden: “There’s no way Uncle Sam can go find out whether you have a gun.”

Right. Gun confiscation will never happen.

IT ALREADY DID!

The following is reproduced verbatim from an article in the Washington Times. It is based upon a survey given to 400,000 law enforcement officers across the country. The boldface is mine.

A national survey of law enforcement shows officers believe many proposed gun control measures including bans on assault weapons — will be ineffective at reducing violent crime and that legal gun ownership by private citizens would prove a better safeguard.

Among the findings of a survey by the industry website PoliceOne, which tallied responses from 15,000 verified active and retired law enforcement professionals, police overwhelmingly favor an armed citizenry and are skeptical of any greater restrictions placed on gun purchase, ownership or accessibility, editor Doug Wyllie said.

The survey found that 91.5 percent of respondents believe a federal ban on the manufacture or sale of semi-automatic weapons would have no effect or a negative effect on the reduction of violent crime. Though a national assault weapons ban is dead in the water, numerous states including Maryland, Connecticut and New York have adopted or enhanced their own bans.

The vast majority of officers also believe legally armed citizens are important in the reduction of crime rates.

“It’s my analysis that by and large law enforcement officers favor enforcement of current laws and enforcement against illegal guns,” Mr. Wyllie said. “They also favor responsible, armed citizens in the midst of other civilians out there to help protect innocents from harm.”

When asked what would help most in preventing a large-scale public shooting, the majority of respondents, 28.8 percent, favor more permissive concealed-carry policies for civilians. The second most popular answer, with 19.6 percent, was that more aggressive institutionalization for mentally ill persons would prevent a large-scale shooting, followed by 15.8 percent who believed more armed security would prevent such a tragedy.

Less than 1 percent of respondents believed that further restrictions on assault weapons and ammunition magazines would prevent a large-scale shooting.

When asked what impact a legally armed citizen could have had in a mass shooting such as the school shooting in Newtown, Conn. or movie theater shooting in Aurora, Colo., a whopping 80 percent believed casualties would have been reduced while another 6.2 percent thought casualties would have been avoided altogether.

As long as civilians were deemed psychologically and medically capable and did not have any felony convictions, 91.3 percent favored allowing civilians to carry concealed firearms.

The survey was publicized to more than 400,000 registered PoliceOne members and vetted to ensure responders worked in law enforcement, Mr. Wyllie said. While not scientifically conducted, the poll was an opportunity to give rank-and-file officers who Mr. Wyllie said might be dissuaded from speaking publicly on the gun control debate a way to “be seen on the issue.”

“There hasn’t been a venue from which everyday patrol officers and sergeants can chime in,” Mr. Wyllie said. More than half of respondents identified themselves as officers or sergeants, while two-thirds came from departments with 500 or fewer personnel and three-quarters said they were currently on the job.

The survey also revealed divergent thoughts on gun buyback programs, which gained renewed attention in the wake of the Newtown shooting. While police departments around the county have hosted gun buybacks, touted as a way to get dangerous weapons off the streets, 81.5 percent of respondents did not believe gun buybacks were effective in reducing gun violence.

Police officers: Obama’s gun-control proposals would have made things worse. “Contrary to what the mainstream media and certain politicians would have us believe, police overwhelmingly favor an armed citizenry, would like to see more guns in the hands of responsible people, and are skeptical of any greater restrictions placed on gun purchase, ownership, or accessibility.”

That’s the conclusion of Doug Wylie, editor of PoliceOne.com, in his write-up of a national survey of more than 15,000 law-enforcement officers about possible new restrictions on gun owners. Those would be the kind of new restrictions Obama and Biden continued to campaign for.

The PoliceOne.com survey showed that law enforcement officers overwhelmingly believe the legislative package Obama and Biden have been pushing would be ineffective at best and detrimental at worst.

  • Asked whether a federal ban on ammunition magazines holding more than 10 rounds would reduce violent crime, 96 percent said no.
  • Asked whether a federal ban on “assault weapons” would reduce violent crime, 61 percent said it would have no effect. Respondents were almost three times as likely to say the ban would make violent crime worse (21 percent) as to say it would help reduce it at all (8 percent).
  • Asked about the impact of the president’s proposed legislation on police officers’ safety, respondents were twice as likely to say the bill would make them less safe (25 percent) as to say it would make them more safe (12 percent).
  • Asked what would be the best way to prevent future mass public killings, a plurality (29 percent) said “more permissive concealed carry policies for civilians.”

Listen closely as you watch the videos and hear a California liberal tell the interviewer, “I ride my bike, I hang out with my friends, and go to the beach.” This is the product of Obama and liberal handouts: ‘adults’ who hang out, ride bikes, and go to the beach.

DID YA’ FREAKIN’ EVER HEAR OF “WORK?” Not in Mexifornia!

Want to see just how bad the insanity problem among liberals is? Watch these videos. You’ll love ’em.

 


We’re flying these flags because liberals tell us we can’t.

HAVE YOU VOTED IN OUR LATEST POLL?


Whose political philosophy is the MOST dangerous to America?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

MonTueWedThuFriSatSun
   1234
2627282930  
       
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
293031    
       

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR POSTS VIA EMAIL

Enter your email address to receive notifications of new posts by email.

VOTE IN OUR LATEST POLL BELOW

Whose political philosophy is the MOST dangerous to America?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...



Ban Muslims!




For security, be sure to use "https://" whenever you surf this website!

READ 10 RECENT COMMENTS BELOW

CLICK BELOW FOR ALL OUR 9/11 POSTS

MUSIC THAT WILL MAKE LIBERALS CRINGE

A VIDEO MEMORIAL TO & FOR OUR TROOPS

FLUSH HILLARY TO SEE THE BODY COUNT

READ ALL ABOUT TWITTER’S TYRANNY

READ ALL ABOUT FAKEBOOK’S TYRANNY

LEARN TO SPEAK MUSLIM IN 30 SECONDS

SEE OUR MUHAMMAD CARTOON CONTEST

CLICK FOR OUR POLL AND POLL ARCHIVES

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR POSTS VIA EMAIL

Enter your email address to receive notifications of new posts by email.

POST CALENDAR

June 2017
M T W T F S S
« May    
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  

POST ARCHIVES

POST CATEGORIES